I'm not normally a fan of ialtstrluions in this sort of style, I see it a lot and it's just not something that appeals to me, no matter how good it is, to me it's too busy but there's something different about these ialtstrluions that I quite like, perhaps its the colours and subjects. I like the mix of illustration styles and additional textures, it just brings the whole image out and makes it more interesting.

Wealth Inequality is a natural phemonena and we or anyone (including lawmakers) can't pretty much do anything thing about it. Any attempt via wealth re-distribution, will fail. As objectivists usual favorite line : 'A' is just 'A'. An attempt to change 'A' into 'B' will fail.An interesting short article from New Scientist mag from a few years ago..PS : For interested researchers in economics, sociology or policy advisors to politicians, the conference proceedings from Kolkata Saha Institue, mentioned in the New-Scientist article above has been published in : , which is available at Amazon. http://esvlsgq.com [url=http://bemcogdwkwg.com]bemcogdwkwg[/url] [link=http://jlulfcig.com]jlulfcig[/link]

Damn, I just posted my maessge and it disappeared. Here it is again.---------------------------------Wealth Inequality is a natural phenomenon and we or anyone (including lawmakers) can't pretty much do anything thing about it. Any attempt via wealth re-distribution, will fail. As objectivists usual favourite line : 'A' is just 'A'. An attempt to change 'A' into 'B' will fail.An interesting short article from New Scientist mag from a few years ago..PS : For interested researchers in economics, sociology or policy advisors to politicians, the conference proceedings from Kolkata Saha Institue in India, mentioned in the New-Scientist article above has been published in : , which is available at Amazon.

Central planning alayws fails. It is beyond the ability of the any central planner to manage the literally billions of market decisions made each day. Hayek argued that the failure of central planning would be perceived by the public as an absence of sufficient power by the state to implement an otherwise good idea. Such a perception would lead the public to vote more power to the state, and would assist the rise to power of a “strong man” perceived to be capable of “getting the job done”. After these developments Hayek argued that a country would be ineluctably driven into outright totalitarianism.CollectivismDemocracyCentralized planningStrong, charismatic leadershipNational unityGovernment entitlements These are the ingredients for tyranny and these are the things an increasing number of Americans are calling for. Liberty cannot survive in this environment. Only when the government is limited to its legitimate role and minorities are protected from the passions of the masses can liberty and freedom exist. It is slipping away right before our very eyes.

Cover from the book "Hayek - A Commemorative Album" by John Raybould